Amazing Images of the International Space Station
Ralf Vandebergh captures incredible images of the International Space Station, the Space Shuttle and other Earth-orbiting satellites. I’ve always been a huge fan of Ralf’s work. It inspires me to try and capture better images of the ISS.
Ralf doesn’t have a website though, and so it can be difficult to find his work scattered throughout the various forums and observing lists he contributes to.
So with Ralf’s permission, I wanted to showcase his amazing images and compile a collection of some of his best images of the International Space Station and Space Shuttle, including the first ever image of a space-walking astronaut captured from Earth!
Please continue reading to see more of Ralf’s amazing photos, and to find out about the equipment he uses, how he captures these incredible images and to learn more about the man himself.
This image below is, to my knowledge, the first and only image showing a spacewealking astronaut as captured from Earth.
This incredible photo was taken on March 21, 2009, during STS-119 and has been the subject of much scrutiny. While only a few pixels, the placement and timing matches up perfectly with where the spacewalking astronaut was positioned at that time. Other features on the ISS that are only 2 metres resolution have been captured by Ralf before, which adds weight to the argument that it certainly is possible to capture a spacewalking astronaut.
NASA chose Ralf’s image to be Astronomy Picture of the Day for 10th April 2009, adding more weight that Ralf’s capture is confirmed.
For a comparison of features on the International Space Station as captured by Ralf, please check out this exploded view of the ISS configuration.
The image below shows the ISS and the Automated Transfer Vehicle, Jules Verne, captured 1 day apart.
The image below shows the ISS with the M-65 Progress Supply Vehicle attached. The solar panels of the M-65 are visible on the left.
The image below shows the Quest Airlock on the ISS.
The Unity and Destiny modules with the Quest Airlock.
Labelled view showing the Quest Joint Airlock, Crewlock and Equipment Lock.
Incredible detailed view of the ISS showing the Canadarm 2 robotic arm and the Starboard SARJ (Solar Alpha Rotary Joint).
Amazing view of Space Shuttle Endeavour (STS-126) with it’s payload bay doors open.
Labelled view of the ISS as captured on December 29th, 2008. Shows the solar panels, truss segments and other modules.
Close-up view of the Zvezda and Zarya modules.
Detailed view of the Columbus and Kibo modules.
International Space Station captured on the 29th January 2009.
This image shows the Lira antenna on the Zvezda module.
This incredible image shows both robotic arms (Canadarm 1 and Canadarm 2) resolved as Space Shuttle Discovery is docked with the ISS during mission STS-119.
We can even see the NASA emblem on Space Shuttle Discovery, as captured during STS-119.
Image showing a capture of the UARS (research satellite) at the same scale as the space shuttle.
Ralf and His Equipment
Ralf lives in the Netherlands, and has been interested in spaceflight from childhood when he got his first telescope, a 60mm refractor. Years later he bought his first 15cm refractor, and was particularly interested in the Moon, Sun and Planets.
In early 2000, Ralf became an active planet astrophotographer and in 2006 his special interest in photographing the storms on Saturn paid off as some of images made it to the NASA Cassini team.
Below is a picture of the equipment Ralf uses to capture the ISS, Space Shuttle and other satellite images. It’s a 25cm (10″) f/4.8 Newtonian, and as a capture device he uses an ATIK instruments ATK-2C camera.
In the last few years as digital astrophotography advanced further, his old interest in spaceflight increased again and he started to capture images of the ISS and other satellites. He uses his 6×30 finderscope and tries to keep the satellite centered in the crosshairs – it’s becoming a real sport for Ralf to do it well, these days.
The image below shows Ralf in action. The camera is recording video while Ralf attempts to manually track the fast-moving satellite as it flies overhead.
Ralf’s images of the ISS are are mostly selected from the AVI using Registax. He almost always use single frames, shot at 10 fps with the ATIK. Sometimes when there are more good frames available, he tries to combine more frames or parts of it to improve image quality.
Ralf is still working on a website to display his excellent images, but for now you can find more of his work on his temporary page here. His new images will be added there over time, and it also has his email address if you’d like to contact him.
Many thanks to Ralf for allowing me to showcase his inspiring images, made all the more incredible given the equipment and techniques he uses.
Thanks for reading.
Related posts:
- International Space Station – 31st August 2009
On the 31st August 2009, we had a reasonably high...
posted in Astrophotography | 11 Comments




















My name is Mike Salway and I'm an amateur astronomer and photographer. I'm the co-founder of 



I’m puzzled and disappointed by the apparent failure to verify the techniques used by Vandebergh, Thierry Legault and Etienne Simian to photograph ISS. Each technique is distinctly different but none are being duplicated?
“Independent verification” is a pillar of the “scientific method”.
Until the photos are verified, caution regarding their veracity should be exercised.
What are you suggesting, Neil? That the photos of the ISS aren’t real? Can you elaborate?
I’m not sure but I think it’s highly probable that the photos are fake. We use the scientific method because it works but for it to work, it has to be used. The main pillar of “independent verification” seems to be consistently absent when it comes to NASA activities. With all of the amateur and professional astrophotographers on the planet today, I’m puzzled that not a single one has apparently duplicated the work of Vandebergh, Legault or Simian.
Another good example of scientific failing is the absurd notion that Europe, India, China and Japan would all send lunar orbiters with cameras incapable of independently verifying Apollo landing site remnants. NASA’s LRO with its recent release of a mere 23 photos some of which allegedly show Apollo remnants are useless as scientific verification since its NASA verifying NASA. It’s not independent and it’s not science.
Mysteriously, CNN has chosen to completely ignore the LRO Apollo remnant photos even though they were released by NASA near the anniversary of the alleged Apollo 11 landing.
Pay no mind to Neil. He is on every website there is tossing out his babble about how he doesn’t believe anything that he cant touch. The world is The Matrix to him.
Beautiful work Mike! Keep up the amazing work!
The Latin word for truth is veritas.
Veritas sounds a lot like verify.
I wonder if truth and verify are somehow related.
Tiger Woods seems to make shots that are impossible for other people. I’ve not been able to verify that he is really that skilled. I haven’t ruled out that it could be trick photography. The fact that he has spent so much money buying clubs and practicing all the time is not proof. The fact that he hasn’t taken time to show me his techniques means to me that he may not really have these abilities…
Thanks for sharing the photos (real or not)!
Neil, I’ve captured my OWN images of the ISS – so I know they’re not faked and I know it’s possible.
Thanks for your comment though
Ralf Vandebergh
Nice work on your ISS images. I would like to know what # X barlow did you use? Also what do you focus on to get a sharp ISS. Please email answer to lordphilip@optonline.net.
Thanks
Philip
Hi,
I love these images of the ISS / Shuttle / space going hardware. I too have imaged the ISS (poorly) but can imagine it being done better. I used a LX90-8″ and a colour video camera @2000mm focal length. At that focal length, the ISS was perhaps fifty pixels wide. To get better resolution I can imagine one would need to go to about 8000mm focal length with a commensurate increase in aperture, I don’t think Dawes limit will apply for structures that are not point sources of light. The issue would be the seeing, and with video that can really pop good images occasionally.
Regards,
Tony Barry